Vorbrich v. Geuder & Paeschke Manufacturing Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Milwaukee county: D. II. JohNSON, Circuit Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
Cassoday, 0. J.
It appears from the record: That the plaintiff was employed by the defendant to work in its factory about the 1st of September, 1893. That prior to that time he had been engaged in working upon similar, but smallei’, machines. That upon going to work for the defendant he worked upon two or three smaller machines before working upon the machine by which he was injured, which was No. 2. That that machine consisted of a die or punch, which was caused to be set in motion by the operator pressing his foot upon the treadle; the result of which was to engage, by means of a clutch, a…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Mullen v. . St. JohnNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Judson v. Giant Powder Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
- Volkmar v. Manhattan Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Cummings v. National Furnace Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
- Dixon v. PlunsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Baxter v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
- Groth v. ThomannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
- Maitland v. Gilbert Paper Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
- Chybowski v. Bucyrus Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
- Lee v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.