Legal Opinion
Sinclair Prairie Pipe Line Co. v. Excise Board
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 19, 1935No. 25436PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWelch, J.
Two propositions were originally presented, the first of which is now admitted by the protestants to be not well taken, in view of opinions of this court rendered subsequent to the perfecting of the appeal.
The remaining question involves an alleged excessive general fund levy for the benefit of school district No. 31 of Seminole county. The exact point at issue is whether or not chapter 85, S. L. 1933, requires the tax levying officials to calculate net, unincumbered, and uncollected taxes for all prior years, using the same as a basis for financing the appropriations for the current fiscal…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- O'Neil Engineering Co. v. Incorporated Town of RyanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Aaronson v. SmileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- In Re MonsellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Albrecht v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Protest of TrimbleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- St. Louis-S. F. R. v. Choctaw County Excise BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Stanolind Pipe Line Co. v. Tulsa County Excise BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Branch v. Oklahoma County Excise BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Excise Board of Oklahoma County v. Continental OilSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Opinion No. (1991), Oklahoma Attorney General Reports1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.