Legal Opinion
Stanolind Pipe Line Co. v. Tulsa County Excise Board
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 5, 1938No. 28356PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWelch, J.
This is an appeal from the judgment of the Court of Tax Review involving protests to certain tax levies which will hereinafter appear.
The. first item involves a protest of the general fund levy of school district No. 34 of Tulsa county, and particularly concerns an appropriation for the purpose of paying transfer fees' and the levy made for the purpose of financing the same.
It is asserted that the school district board did not make a request of the excise board for an appropriation for such purpose; that it did not include in its estimate of needs any item for transfer fees. The estimate of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson v. RitterbuschSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- In Re County Com'rs of Counties Comprising Seventh Judicial Dist.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- City of Pond Creek v. HaskellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Johnson v. Grady CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Bishop v. City of TulsaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1922
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- City of Del City v. Fraternal Order of Police, Lodge No. 114Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Grimes v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- Grimes v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- Stanolind Pipe Line Co. v. Payne County, Excise BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939