Legal Opinion
Diaz v. Quitoriano
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 15, 1969No. Civ. 11723PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPierce, P. J.
Petitioners sought a writ of mandate from the superior court directed to respondents Sutter County Welfare Department and its director. The court denied and dismissed the petition on the ground it lacked jurisdiction to issue the writ because petitioners had failed to exhaust their administrative remedies. 1 Petitioners appeal. We hold that no administrative remedy existed.
The superior court never issued an alternative writ. It reached its decision after a special hearing ordered by it on the jurisdictional issue. Since respondents were not required to answer an alternative writ (Code Civ.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Rosenfield v. MalcolmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Gaylord v. City of PasadenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Weaver v. Pasadena Tournament of Roses Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Board of Social Welfare v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Hollon v. PierceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Sail'er Inn, Inc. v. KirbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- La Sala v. American Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Glendale City Employees' Ass'n v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Anton v. San Antonio Community HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Green v. ObledoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.