Legal Opinion
United States v. National City Bank of New York
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 5, 1950PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIFKIND, District Judge.
The first entitled action was commenced on August 1, 1947 and the second, on March 28, 1939. Both were tried to the court together.
In form the first is an action by the assignee of a bank-account against the bank for the balance owing to the depositor, demand having been made and refused. In addition, the complaint seeks a declaration that the Receivers have no interest in. the deposit-account. 1 The simplicity of the form of the action, however, is but the deceptive facade behind which hover a host of questions produced by the rupture of normal Russo-American…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. PinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- &198tna National Bank v. . Fourth National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Clark v. WilliardSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- The SapphireSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- National City Bank of NY v. Republic of ChinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Yucyco, Ltd. v. Republic of SloveniaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Carl Marks & Co. v. Union of Soviet Socialist RepublicsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
- Republic of China v. National City Bank of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
- Republic of China v. National City Bank of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1952
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.