Legal Opinion
Republic of China v. National City Bank of New York
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided December 8, 1953No. 22773_1PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRANK, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiffs, the Republic of China (with its National Government now located in Formosa) and others, brought this suit under section 25(b) of the Federal Reserve Act, 12 U.S.C.A. § 632, to recover $200,000 which, according to the complaint, was deposited with the defendant bank and which defendant refuses to pay. The complaint alleges that the deposit was made by plaintiff, the Shanghai-Nanking Railway Administration, an agency of the Republic of China, and that the Secretary of State of Hie United States, pursuant to section 25(b) has certified to defendant that the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States v. Norwegian Barque TheklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- In Re Monongahela Rye Liquors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944
- Nassau Smelting & Refining Works, Ltd. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Wallace v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- National City Bank of NY v. Republic of ChinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Rieser v. Baltimore Ohio Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- George Dedmon v. Falls Products IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
- Carl Marks & Co. v. Union of Soviet Socialist RepublicsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
- Et Ve Balik Kurumu v. B. N. S. International Sales Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1960
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.