Legal Opinion
Republic of China v. National City Bank of New York
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 22, 1952PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
IRVING R. KAUFMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, The Republic of China, and others, have commenced an action against the defendant, under Section 632 of Title 12 U.S.C.A. to recover the sum of $200,000 said to be on deposit with defendant and which the defendant refuses to pay. This sum was deposited in the name of plaintiff Shanghai-Nanking Railway Administration, said to be an agency of the Ministry of Communications of the plaintiff, The Republic of China. The Secretary of State, pursuant to Section 25(b) of the Federal Reserve Act has certified to defendant that the deposit in question…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Kunglig Jarnvagsstyrelsen v. Dexter & Carpenter, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
- Republic of China v. American Express Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- United States v. National City Bank of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
- Anderson v. N. v. Transandine HandelmaatschappijNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
- Hannes v. Kingdom of Roumania Monopolies InstituteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- National City Bank of NY v. Republic of ChinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Republic of China v. National City Bank of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
- Et Ve Balik Kurumu v. B. N. S. International Sales Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1960
- Cruz v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2002
- Pang-Tsu-Mow v. Republic of ChinaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.