Legal Opinion
Morgan v. United States
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
Decided October 2, 1952No. Civ. A. Nos. 2321, 2322PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, Circuit Judge.
These two actions were instituted by Reed Morgan and Carl W. Schmid, Sr., the respective plaintiffs therein, to obtain the return of certain slot machines owned by them and seized by agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation in Louisville, Kentucky, on January 18, 1952. Following the seizure, the machines were turned over to defendant L. E. Cranor, United States Marshal for the Western District of Kentucky, who has had possession of them since that time. The original petitions named the United States of America as the only defendant, but by amended petitions, the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Spector Motor Service, Inc. v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Rescue Army v. Municipal Court of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Aircraft & Diesel Equipment Corp. v. HirschSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Sterling v. ConstantinSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rice v. Walls, U.S. Dist. Atty. Puckett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1954
- Morgan v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1952
- Putch v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1970