Legal Opinion

State v. McAlister

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 5, 1982No. 8225SC213PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

While defendant makes eleven assignments of error, because of our disposition we only find it necessary to discuss two arguments in this opinion.

First, defendant attacks the sufficiency of the evidence on the two burglary charges. He does not contest the assault conviction.

Burglary is defined in North Carolina by the common law and G.S. 14-51 as “the breaking and entering of the dwelling house of another in the nighttime with intent to commit a felony therein.” State v. Cooper, 288 N.C. 496, 499, 219 S.E. 2d 45, 47 (1975). An attempt is generally defined as “an act done with…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. RieraSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. State v. SurlesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  3. State v. SurlesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  4. State v. CooperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  5. State v. . GibsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. WeaverCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  2. State v. GoodmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  3. State v. LeaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  4. State v. BennettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  5. State v. BennettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API