State v. Goodman
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EAGLES, Judge.
I
Defendant first assigns as error the sufficiency of the evidence upon which the jury based its guilty verdict as to the charge of attempted first degree burglary. We find no error.
The basis of defendant’s argument is that where the State’s evidence tended to show that defendant merely loosened the corner of a window screen, there was insufficient evidence to convince a jury beyond a reasonable doubt that there was an entering or intent to commit larceny, required elements of the crime of attempted first degree burglary. We disagree.
Burglary is defined in North Carolina by the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. OdomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. SweezySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- State v. BeaverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- State v. SurlesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. BumgarnerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- State v. WorthamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. WorthamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.