Legal Opinion

State v. . Gibson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 20, 1946PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendants were tried upon five bills of indictment, for offenses growing out of the same or interrelated transactions and consolidated for the purpose of trial: Two for assault with a deadly weapon, one for kidnapping, one for attempted burglary, and one for forcible trespass. They were convicted on the charges of attempted burglary and forcible trespass, and acquitted on the others.

The evidence for the State tends to show as follows:

Mrs. Marshall owned a country place in Caswell County, consisting of extensive grounds, containing the home, a near-by house occupied by the caretaker, Jake…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. . OxendineSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  2. State v. DavenportSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  3. State v. . DavenportSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  4. State v. . EarpSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  5. State v. . PollokSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1844

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. HollandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  2. State v. MatthewsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  3. State v. McAlisterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API