Legal Opinion

Remy v. Olds

California Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1891No. 13770PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Merced County. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Fitzgerald, C.

This is an action for damages for breach of contract.

Two alleged causes of action are separately stated in the amended complaint, in each of which the contract, which is in writing, is declared on in hse'c verba, and contains, in brief, the following terms and conditions: —

On the part of plaintiff: —

1. During the fall of 1888 to thoroughly plow, level, and put in good condition to irrigate and plant in vines and trees, all of lots 49 and 50.

2. Before April 1,1889, to thoroughly irrigate, cultivate, and plant one fourth each of said lots in first-class Malaga raisin grape-vines,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hale v. TroutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Crist v. ArmourNew York Supreme Court · 1861
  3. Bunge v. . KoopNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  4. Parrott v. ByersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
  5. Chipman v. EmericCalifornia Supreme Court · 1855

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Bentley v. Standard Fire InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. O'Neill v. Supreme CouncilSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1904
  3. San Diego Construction Co. v. MannixCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Roche v. BaldwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Allsopp v. Joshua Hendy Machine WorksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API