State v. Grantham

¶1 — Jonathan Grantham appeals a restitution order entered more than 180 days after his sentencing. He asserts that the trial court lacked good cause to continue the restitution hearing beyond the statutory 180-day deadline. We agree and reverse and remand for vacation of the restitution order.1

FACTS

¶2 On October 21,2010, Grantham pleaded guilty to five charges, including residential burglary and first degree possession of stolen property. The trial court did not order resti*401tution when Grantham entered his plea. Grantham waived his appearance at any subsequent restitution hearing.

¶3 The trial…