Legal Opinion

McLean v. Stanley

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 12, 1931No. 30,103PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hutchison, J.:

This is an action for the construction of a will. The question involved is, whether the will creates a vested remainder or a contingent remainder.

The remainder in question is to a granddaughter of the testator after two life estates, one to the wife of the testator and the second to his daughter Alvina. The remainder is to the children of Alvina in fee.

When the will was executed Alvina was married but had no children, but at the death of the testator, nine years later, Alvina had one child, a daughter, about six years old. Four years…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Markham v. WatermanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  2. Bunting v. SpeekSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889
  3. Bullock v. WiltbergerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  4. Kirkpatrick v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
  5. Purl v. PurlSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Baldwin v. HambletonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  2. Buxton v. NobleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  3. Epperson v. BennettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1946
  4. In Re Estate of WoodsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  5. Commercial National Bank v. MartinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API