Legal Opinion

Buxton v. Noble

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 6, 1937No. 33,544PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Wedell, J.:

This action was brought by testamentary trustees under the last will and testament of Edward A. Noble, deceased. The action was commenced after the estate of Edward A. Noble had been administered, and in order to obtain a construction of his will. The trial court found the will created a vested, and not a contingent, remainder in four residuary legatees and devisees mentioned in paragraph nine of the will. From that ruling plaintiffs appeal.

They contend the will created a contingent remainder, and since only one of the remaindermen, Paul L.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Markham v. WatermanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  2. Bunting v. SpeekSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889
  3. Kirkpatrick v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
  4. Purl v. PurlSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  5. Hoover v. RobertsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Beall v. HardieSupreme Court of Kansas · 1955
  2. In Re Estate of WorksSupreme Court of Kansas · 1950
  3. Baldwin v. HambletonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  4. Epperson v. BennettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1946
  5. Cramer v. BrowneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1945

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API