Legal Opinion

Purl v. Purl

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 9, 1921No. 22,786PublishedCited by 30 opinions

Appeal from Shawnee district court, division No. 2; George H. Whitcomb, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

The appeal was taken from a judgment of the district court based on an interpretation of a will, the decision being that a remainder to children of a life tenant, if he had any living, was contingent until death of the life tenant.

Thomas C. Purl made the will in the year 1880. The will begins as follows:

“Know all men by these presents, that I, Thomas C. Purl, of Carrolton, in the county of Greene and state of Illinois, being in good health and of sound mind, do make this, my last will and testament, that my land at my death shall be divided…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Carter v. CarterIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Cole v. ColeIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Peet v. PeetIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Smith v. ChesterIllinois Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Bryant v. FlannerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Kirkpatrick v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
  2. In Re Estate of WorksSupreme Court of Kansas · 1950
  3. Buxton v. NobleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  4. Allen v. PedderSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  5. Cramer v. BrowneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1945

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API