Legal Opinion

Schroeder v. Ziegelman

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 2, 1969No. 24760PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALVIN C. RANDALL, Special Judge.

Plaintiff dug a canal at and near the water line of the Lake of the Ozarks. It was dug in the shallow water near the shore line and extended inland for some distance, thereby permitting the water to flow inland in the narrow excavation for a short distance. The purpose was to create a convenient place for plaintiff to dock his boat. The next day after the excavation was made defendant came with a bulldozer and filled the excavation. He stated to plaintiff that he would fill the canal as fast as plaintiff might open it. Plaintiff then secured a temporary…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Barnhart v. RipkaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956
  2. Milgram v. Jiffy Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  3. Aetna Insurance v. O'MalleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1938
  4. Fleming-Gilchrist Construction Co. v. McGonigleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1935
  5. Metropolitan Land Co. v. ManningMissouri Court of Appeals · 1903

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Moschale v. MockMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Kugler v. RyanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Shapiro Bros., Inc. v. Jones-Festus Properties, L.L.C.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Nixon v. WilliamsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API