Legal Opinion
Beck v. Reinholtz
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 27, 1956No. Civ. 5249PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMussell, J.
This is an action to quiet title to real property in Orange County. Two causes of action were alleged in the complaint. The first cause of action was in the usual short form. In the second cause of action plaintiffs alleged ownership of the property; that on or about December 4, 1946, they secured a loan from defendant James M. Mc-Cauley in the sum of $1,847.41 and executed their promissory note therefor; that plaintiffs executed a trust deed on the property involved for the purpose of securing payment of said note; that McCauley transferred and assigned his interest in said note and trust…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Poochigian v. LayneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Seidell v. Tuxedo Land Co.California Court of Appeal · 1934
- Security-First National Bank of LA v. CryerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Vallera v. ValleraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Grueninger v. Livingstone & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1949
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Family Service Agency of Santa Barbara v. AmesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Newport v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Main I Ltd. Partnership v. Venture Capital Construction & Development Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
- Pickens v. American Mortgage ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Golden v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.