Legal Opinion
Beaux Arts Properties, Inc. v. United Nations Development Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 18, 1972PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMax Bloom, J.
Plaintiff (Beaux Arts), the owner of two buildings located on East 44th Street which, collectively, are operated as a hotel, seeks a determination declaring that chapter 345 of the Laws of 1968 (as amd. by L. 1969, ch. 1006 and L. 1971, ch. 623, is unconstitutional; that the implementation thereof by the plan proposed by United Nations Development Corp. (UNDO), and approved by Housing and Development Administration of the City of New York (HDA), by the City Planning Commission of the City of New York (CPC) and by the Board of Estimate, is unconstitutional; and that defendants, by exercising…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Transportation Co. v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Danforth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- United States v. Virginia Electric & Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Doolittle v. . Supervisors of Broome CountyNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Harriet II. v. Alex LL.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Kohlasch v. New York State Thruway AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1980
- Duwa, Inc. v. City of TempeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- Campbell v. BarraudNew York Supreme Court · 1975
- In re the City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.