Legal Opinion
People v. Blankenship
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided April 6, 1943No. Docket No. 94, Calendar No. 41,970PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.
Defendant appeals from his conviction for selling certain mineral deeds, held to be “securities,” in violation of the so-called “blue sky law” (2 Comp. Laws 1929, § 9769 et seq., as amended by Acts Nos. 229 and 255, Pub. Acts 1931, and by Act No. 37, Pub. Acts 1935 [Stat. Ann. §19.741 et seq.]). (Later amended by Act No. 167, Pub. Acts 1937, and by Act No. 165, Pub. Acts 1941.)
The information charged that between July 10th and August 12, 1936, without being licensed by the Michigan corporation and securities commission as a dealer, broker, or salesman, defendant sold one Clara A. Price…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Palms v. PalmsMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- State v. OgdenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- State v. W. K. Pullen D.B.A. T. S. Hose Asso.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1937
- People v. SowallMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
- Freeze v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Moffit v. SederlundMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
- People v. BreckenridgeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
- Witter v. BuchananAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
- Prince v. Heritage Oil Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1981
- Shepperd v. Boettcher & Co., Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.