Legal Opinion
People v. Sowall
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided March 2, 1937No. Docket No. 121, Calendar No. 39,068PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChandler, J.
Defendants were convicted of having sold certain securities, to-wit: “beneficial interest in or title to property” in violation of Act No. 220, Pub. Acts 1923, as amended (2 Comp. Laws 1929, § 9769 et seq.) said securities not having been accepted for .filing by the Michigan securities commission as required by the provisions of said act.
The convictions rest upon sales made by the defendants to various individuals of fractional interests of purported heirs in “The New Harlem Patentees Estates” claimed to be under investigation by a corporation organized under the laws of California known as…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Merrick Et Al. v. N. W. Halsey & Company Et Al., and the Weis Fibre Container CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- State v. Gopher Tire & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- Loomis v. RogersMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
- People v. WohlfordMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
- State v. SummerlandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- People v. MiltonMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
- Rohan v. Detroit Racing AssociationMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
- Metropolitan Funeral System Ass'n v. Commissioner of InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
- Michigan Boiler & Sheet Iron Works Ex Rel. American Mutual Liability Co. v. DresslerMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
- Kull v. Michigan State Apple CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.