Legal Opinion

State v. Ogden

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 2, 1923No. 23,264PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBibell, J.

The defendant was convicted in Hennepin county of the crime of selling investment contracts without a license. He appeals from the judgment.

The instrument claimed to be an investment contract is styled “statement and purchase.” It recites that the defendant subdivided a leasehold of an 80-acre tract of land in Big Horn county, Wyoming, into 4,800 equal, undivided units or fractional interests and is offering 3,000 for sale at $120,000; and that each purchaser purchased separately the number of units set opposite his name. This instrument was signed and acknowledged by the defendant. Following…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. Gopher Tire & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  2. State v. EvansSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  3. State v. SummerlandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Crude Oil Corp. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937
  2. Kerst v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  3. State v. SwensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  4. State v. . HeathSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  5. State v. Investors Security CorporationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API