Legal Opinion

Palms v. Palms

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1888PublishedCited by 35 opinions

Appealfrom Wayne. (Jennison, J.) Bill filed to construe a will. Francis F. Palms and Michael W. O’Brien, complainants, and all of the defendants appeal from decree holding the will void, etc. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

Francis Palms, a resident of the city of Detroit, on the twenty-sixth day of July, 1884, duly executed the following as his last will and testament:

“ I hereby give, devise, and bequeath all my property to-Francis F. Palms, Clotilde Palms, and Michael W. O’Brien, as trustees, and in trust for the uses and purposes following, to wi't:

££ 1. To collect all rents and other moneys owing to my estate; to sell, lease, repair, and improve any of my property; to invest and re-invest the proceeds thereof in lands in the city of Detroit, and interest and dividend paying securities; and to do all acts and…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Savage v. . BurnhamNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  2. Smith v. . EdwardsNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  3. Warner v. . DurantNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  4. Purdy v. . HaytNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  5. Monarque v. . MonarqueNew York Court of Appeals · 1880

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. In re Estate of WalkerlyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Battjes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1949
  3. Becker v. ChesterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
  4. State v. SnyderWyoming Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Gardner v. City National Bank & Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API