Legal Opinion
Mittleman v. United States Treasury
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 29, 1991No. Civ. A. 86-1852 SSHPublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STANLEY S. HARRIS, District Judge.
Now before the Court is defendants’ motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, defendants’ motion is granted in part and denied in part. 1
Background
The following facts have been taken from the amended complaint. 2 In May 1980, plaintiff was hired for a GS-13, Schedule A position on the Chrysler Loan Guarantee Board (CLGB) staff at the United States Department of the Treasury (Treasury). As part of her job, plaintiff kept track of the many reports the Chrysler Corporation was required to submit.…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Griffin v. BreckenridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Smith v. ScaliaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Runkle v. GonzalesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Mickey Downie David Wheat v. City of Middleburg Heights, Richard P. Siegel Thomas SchneiderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Ramirez v. Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Elaine Mittleman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.