Morrow Electric Company, Inc. v. Cruse
District Court, N.D. Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
RICHARD C. FREEMAN, District Judge:
This is a civil rights action brought by a corporate plaintiff under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and its jurisdictional counterpart, 28 U.S.C. § 1343(3), to declare unconstitutional and enjoin the enforcement of the Georgia statutory garnishment scheme as set out at Ga.Code Ann. §§ 46-101, 46-102, and 46-401. (See Appendix). Plaintiff contends that this scheme violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment because it has effectively deprived plaintiff of the use of its property — specifically, a bank account set aside for payment of state and federal…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Grosjean v. American Press Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Mason v. GarrisDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1973
- North Georgia Finishing, Inc. v. Di-Chem, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- North Georgia Finishing, Inc. v. Di-Chem, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Rodriguez v. CarrollDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1981
- Coltharp v. CutlerDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1976
- North Georgia Finishing, Inc. v. Di-Chem, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- North Georgia Finishing, Inc. v. Di-Chem, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975