Legal Opinion

Morrow Electric Company, Inc. v. Cruse

District Court, N.D. Georgia

Decided January 28, 1974No. Civ. A. 19008PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

RICHARD C. FREEMAN, District Judge:

This is a civil rights action brought by a corporate plaintiff under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and its jurisdictional counterpart, 28 U.S.C. § 1343(3), to declare unconstitutional and enjoin the enforcement of the Georgia statutory garnishment scheme as set out at Ga.Code Ann. §§ 46-101, 46-102, and 46-401. (See Appendix). Plaintiff contends that this scheme violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment because it has effectively deprived plaintiff of the use of its property — specifically, a bank account set aside for payment of state and federal…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Grosjean v. American Press Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. Mason v. GarrisDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1973
  5. North Georgia Finishing, Inc. v. Di-Chem, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. North Georgia Finishing, Inc. v. Di-Chem, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Rodriguez v. CarrollDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1981
  3. Coltharp v. CutlerDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1976
  4. North Georgia Finishing, Inc. v. Di-Chem, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. North Georgia Finishing, Inc. v. Di-Chem, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API