Legal Opinion
Rodriguez v. Carroll
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided February 16, 1981No. Civ. A. B-79-207PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
DeANDA, District Judge.
Presently pending before the Court is a Motion to Dismiss Complaint filed by Defendants Yates and Arnett. The Motion alleges, inter alia, that the Complaint fails to state a claim against these Defendants upon which relief can be granted. After reviewing the Motion and supporting arguments, and after reviewing the pleadings on file in this cause, this Court has determined that Plaintiff has failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted against said Defendants, and additionally, has failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Griffin v. BreckenridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. PriceSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Public Utilities Commission v. PollakSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hankins v. Dallas Independent School DistrictDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1988
- Dunn v. New Jersey Transit Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1987
- Sampson v. Village Discount Outlet, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993
- Sharif-Munir-Davidson Development Corp. v. Bell, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1990
- Airgas-Southwest, Inc. v. IWS Gas & Supply of Texas, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2012
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.