Legal Opinion

Wicklund v. North Star Timber Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 14, 1939No. 31,984PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peterson, Justice.

Plaintiff sues to recover for the demolition of his truck while it was being operated by his driver hauling logs under contract with the defendant timber company. The action was brought against both the timber company and its alleged servant Ashlock; but, since the action was dismissed as to Ashlock, we shall refer to the company as the defendant.

Recovery was sought on the theory that defendant is liable under the doctrine of respondeat superior. No personal negligence is charged against defendant. The hauling was done exclusively on defendant’s privately owned haul-roads on…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Bresnick v. HeathMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  2. Higgins v. . Western Union Telegraph Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1898
  3. McColligan v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  4. Osborn v. ClineNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
  5. Brown v. KellySupreme Court of Georgia · 1890

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Jones v. GoodsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
  2. Nepstad v. LambertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  3. Ahlstrom v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  4. Payne v. KinderWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Bolin v. ScheurerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API