Hare v. Bauer
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Thomas Gallagher, Justice.
Plaintiff seeks to recover $á00 commission on the sale of certain real property belonging to defendants, and, in addition, the sum of $200 earnest money advanced by him to defendants on behalf of a prospective purchaser of their property.
The trial court found that no sale had been consummated; that no purchaser ready, willing, and able to purchase defendants’ premises had been procured; and that the $200 sum advanced by plaintiff to defendants had been paid into district court by defendants and was held there pending proof of its ownership. Plaintiff later dismissed…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Francis v. BakerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- McDonald v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Goss v. StevensSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
- Meyer v. Keating Land & Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Martinson v. HenslerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lake Company v. MolanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Fulsom v. EgnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- White v. BoucherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Bailie v. RidkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- Wold v. PattersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.