Legal Opinion

Gilbert v. Cavenham Forest Industries Division

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 30, 2002No. 99-09439; A112661PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, J.

The Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) rejected claimant’s attempt to expand the scope of a previously accepted claim. We affirm.

Claimant first compensably injured his low back working for a previous employer in 1963. Two surgeries, a lumbar laminectomy in 1963 and a lumbar fusion in 1965, alleviated his pain for 15 years, during which he performed unlimited strenuous labor. Then, in January 1980, he fell from a machine at work and again injured his low back. He filed a claim for workers’ compensation and ultimately received an award of 62.5 percent unscheduled permanent partial disability.

In…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Yogman v. ParrottOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Drews v. EBI CompaniesOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. PiwowarOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Stepp v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  5. Freightliner Corp. v. ChristensenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ligatich v. Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  2. Klutsenbeker v. Jackson CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API