Legal Opinion
Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Hay
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 5, 1977No. Civ. No. 38365PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TAYLOR, P. J.
This is an appeal1 by several owners of real property (hereafter collectively referred to as Hay) from a judgment denying relief on their amended cross-complaint seeking damages for inverse condemnation, and malicious infliction of pecuniary harm in a condemnation action initiated by Pacific Gas and Electric Company (hereafter PG&E) and subsequently abandoned. We have concluded that there was sufficient evidence to support the trial court’s findings and conclusions that the condemnation action was filed in good faith and was reasonable and fully justified by the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Selby Realty Co. v. City of San BuenaventuraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Klopping v. City of WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Oak Grove School District v. City Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- City of Los Angeles v. ColeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- City of Hawthorne v. PeeblesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cantu v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1987
- Alameda County Waste Mgmt Authority v. Waste Connections US, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Alameda County Waste Mgmt. Authority v. Waste Connections etc.California Court of Appeal · 2021