Legal Opinion
Allied Mutual Insurance v. Dakota Rose, Inc.
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided April 27, 1999No. Civ. 98-4004PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
PIERSOL, Chief Judge.
[¶ 1] Plaintiff Allied Mutual Insurance Company seeks a declaratory judgment that a commercial general liability insurance policy it issued to defendant, The Dakota Rose, Inc. (“Dakota Rose”), expressly excludes liquor liability coverage. Dakota Rose raises affirmative defenses and brings a counterclaim for breach of contract. Allied moves for summary judgment, and Dakota Rose resists. For the reasons stated below, the Court grants in part and denies in part Allied’s motion for summary judgment.
[¶ 2] Dakota Rose is a video lottery casino and…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Commercial Union Insurance Co. v. Minnie T. Schmidt, and Norma J. KolandCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- Walz v. City of HudsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
- City of Fort Pierre v. United Fire & Casualty Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Youngblood v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2005
- Pins v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.District Court, D. South Dakota · 2005
- Union Insurance Company v. KlingenbergDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2021