Legal Opinion
Youngblood v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Utah
Decided March 31, 2005No. 20040184-CAPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BILLINGS, Presiding Judge:
¶ 1 Robert L. Youngblood II appeals the trial court’s order granting summary judgment to Auto-Owners Insurance Company (Auto-Owners) on Youngblood’s claims of equitable estoppel and bad faith. We reverse and remand.
BACKGROUND
¶ 2 Youngblood, the president and sole owner of Youngblood Home Improvement, Inc., purchased an auto insurance policy (the Policy) from Auto-Owners for his business. The Policy contained coverage for certain specifically designated motor vehicles, and underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage if those vehicles wei'e involved in an accident with…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Harr v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
- Standard Fire Ins. Co. v. MARINE CONTRACTING AND TOWING COMPANYSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
- State Automobile Casualty Underwriters v. RuotsalainenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
- Harasyn v. St. Paul Guardian InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
- Marlin v. Wetzel County Board of EducationWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2002
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Youngblood v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2007
- Allegis Inv. Servs., LLC v. Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.District Court, D. Utah · 2019
- Hall v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2017