Legal Opinion
Pins v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided February 23, 2005No. CIV. 04-4027PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
PIERSOL, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff, Judson Pins (“Pins”) has moved, pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for partial summary judgment on the insurance coverage issues in this case. Pins seeks a judgment that defendant State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. (“State Farm”) owed and breached duties to defend and indemnify Pins in a lawsuit brought against him in circuit court in Minnehaha County, South Dakota. State Farm seeks judgment on the pleadings, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c), contending that it had no duty to defend or indemnify…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lachonne Bell v. Allstate Life Insurance Company Sears Roebuck & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- Pickering v. PickeringSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Judson Pins v. State Farm Fire and Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
- Judson Pins v. State Farm Fire andCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007