Union National Bank v. Williams Milling Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Bay; Maxwell, J. Assumpsit by tbe Union National Bank of Troy against tbe Williams Milling Company, Frank D. Pierson, and George L. Mosher on a promissory note. There was a judgment against the milling company alone, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
This action was brought in assumpsit against the defendant Williams Milling Company (a corporation) as maker, and defendants Frank D. Pierson and George L. Mosher as indorsers, of a promissory note. The declaration is upon the common counts, to which is added a copy of the note sued upon, and a notice that the note constituted the plaintiff’s sole cause of action. Defendants pleaded the general issue. Upon the trial the defendants *536claimed that the notice of protest attached to the note was insufficient to bind defendants Pierson and Mosher as indorsers. It appeared that there was attached to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bailey v. DozierSupreme Court of the United States · 1848
- Burkam v. TrowbridgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1861
- President of the People's Bank v. BrookeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1869
- Nave v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1865
3Cited by1 opinion
- State Bar Grievance Administrator v. PoslerMichigan Supreme Court · 1973