Legal Opinion

In re Baluss

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 13, 1874PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Petition to have respondent’s name stricken from the roll of attorneys.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.

This was a proceeding which sought to have the name .of respondent stricken from the roll of attorneys for professional misbehavior. While not strictly a criminal prosecution, it is of that nature, and the punishment, in prohibiting the party following his ordinary occupation, would he severe and highly penal. The majority of the court are not satisfied that the evidence gives such clear support to the charges as should be required in such cases, and the application will therefore be denied.

Graves, Ch. J., and Campbell, J., concurred. Christiancy, J., did not sit in this case.

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. State Bar Grievance Administrator v. JacksonMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
  2. State Bar of Michigan v. WollMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  3. State Bar Grievance Administrator v. FreidMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  4. State Bar Grievance Administrator v. PoslerMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
  5. In re ClinkMichigan Supreme Court · 1898

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API