Legal Opinion

United States v. Johnson

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided February 12, 1954No. 2588PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Paul W. BrosMAN, Judge:

The accused, Johnson, was convicted by an Army general court-martial of fraudulent enlistment and of inflicting self-injury, in violation respectively of Articles 83 and 115 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, 50 USC § 677 and § 709. The correctness of this action is questioned by the petition of the accused, who maintains that the law officer’s instructions prejudiced him in his defense of insanity. These instructions were in terms substantially identical with those considered by this Court in United States v. Biesak, 3 USCMA 714, 14 CMR 132,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Commonwealth v. ClarkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  3. Commonwealth v. CoxMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
  4. State of Oregon v. GarverOregon Supreme Court · 1950
  5. United States v. BiesakUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. SmithUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  2. United States v. RooksUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
  3. United States v. Major CARL W. AXELSON, JR.Army Court of Criminal Appeals · 2007
  4. United States v. CamposU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1993
  5. United States v. BoykinsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API