Legal Opinion

United States v. Rooks

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided November 20, 1989No. 62,023; CM 8801383PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

On his pleas, Specialist Rooks was convicted of unauthorized absence, escape from confinement, and assault with a means likely to produce grievous bodily harm, in violation of Articles 86, 95, and 128, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 886, 895, and 928, respectively. In his petition to this Court, he contended for the first time1 that the military judge should not have accepted his pleas to the last offense because his responses suggested matters substantially inconsistent with guilt. See Art. 45(a), UCMJ, 10 USC § 845(a). The issue we specified for review shifted the focus…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. DavenportUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
  2. People v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  3. State v. WelshCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973
  4. People v. HigginsNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
  5. United States v. JohnsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. RoaneCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
  2. United States v. CamposCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
  3. United States v. Major CARL W. AXELSON, JR.Army Court of Criminal Appeals · 2007
  4. United States v. TorresCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2015
  5. United States v. AllisonU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API