Legal Opinion
United States v. Biesak
United States Court of Military Appeals
Decided February 12, 1954No. 2676PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
Paul W. Brosman, Judge:
The accused, Biesak, was convicted by general court-martial of desertion with intent to avoid hazardous duty, in violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 85, 50 USC § 679. He was sentenced to receive a dishonorable discharge, to total forfeitures, and to confinement at hard labor for three years. Following approval by the convening authority and affirmance by a Navy board of review, this Court granted the accused’s petition for review. However, the grant was limited to the correctness of the law officer’s instructions on sanity and…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Tot v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Leland v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Agnew v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Casey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- United States v. FordUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
- United States v. SmithUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
- United States v. BabbidgeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
- United States v. GriffithUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
- United States v. BuntingUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.