Legal Opinion

Ninetieth Minnesota State Senate v. Dayton

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 8, 2017No. A17-1142PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

On May 25, 2017, the Ninetieth Minnesota State Senate and the Ninetieth Minnesota State House of Representatives each adjourned sine die, thus ending the special session that began on May 23,2017. On May 30, 2017, the Governor vetoed the line-item appropriation for the Legislature’s biennial budget. This case presents the issue of whether the Governor has the constitutional power to line-item veto the Legislature’s appropriations for itself.

The Governor’s line-item veto authority is conferred by Article IV, section 23 of the Minnesota Constitution, which allows the executive to veto “one…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Starkweather v. BlairSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  2. State Ex Rel. Gardner v. HolmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  3. State v. DahlgrenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  4. Johnson v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  5. County of Beltrami v. MarshallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ninetieth Minnesota State Senate v. DaytonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
  2. Ninetieth Minnesota State Senate v. DaytonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API