Ninetieth Minnesota State Senate v. Dayton
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GILDEA, Chief Justice.
On May 25, 2017, the Ninetieth Minnesota State Senate and the Ninetieth Minnesota State House of Representatives (collectively, the Legislature) each adjourned sine die, ending the special session that began on May 23, 2017. On May 30, 2017, the Governor vetoed line-item appropriations to the Legislature for its biennial budget. The Legislature commenced this action, contending, in part, that the line-item veto power cannot be used over the appropriations to itself without violating the Separation-of-Powers clause, Minn. Const, art. III. The Governor contends that…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- The Pocket Veto CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Chiles v. CHILDREN A, B, C, D, E, AND FSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
- Brayton v. PawlentySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- Rios v. SymingtonArizona Supreme Court · 1992
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cruz-Guzman v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
- State of Alaska, Office of Lieutenant Governor, Division of Elections and Director Gail Fenumiai, in an official capacity v. Recall DunleavyAlaska Supreme Court · 2021
- Olson v. LeschCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2019
- Cruz-Guzman v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
- Steve Simon, Minnesota Secretary of State, Petitioner, vs. Lisa Demuth, Respondent (A25-0066). Melissa Hortman, et al., ...Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2025