County of Beltrami v. Marshall
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Nelson, Justice.
The action involved on this appeal was brought by Beltrami Coun-. ty to obtain a declaratory judgment construing Minn. St. 161.47, subd. 5; 488.10, subd. 6(e); and 488.13, subd. 6(b). The parties stipulated to the facts by and through their respective counsel, the stipulation to stand in place of and be substituted for pleadings both for the purpose of submitting the issues involved to the district court and for *116the purpose of inserting the same into the record for the purpose of appeal to the supreme court. Said stipulation may here be briefly summarized as follows:
Pursuant…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State ex rel. Chase v. PreusSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- State ex rel. City of Waseca v. BabcockSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States Fire Insurance Co. v. Minnesota State Zoological BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- In Re the Welfare of J.B.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- Butler v. HatfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Ninetieth Minnesota State Senate v. DaytonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
- Christina Berrier v. Minnesota State PatrolSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2024
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.