Legal Opinion
United States v. Thomas
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Decided June 21, 2007No. 06-0350/NAPublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judge STUCKY
delivered the opinion of the Court.
We granted review in this case to consider whether the offense of wrongful introduction of a controlled substance onto a military installation, Article 112a, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 912a (2000), requires, as an essential element, that the accused knew he was taking a controlled substance onto an installation. We hold that it does.
*133i.
Pursuant to a pretrial agreement, Appellant pled guilty at a special court-martial to physically controlling a vehicle while impaired by marijuana and wrongfully introducing marijuana onto…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- United States v. BaileySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. CareUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
- Busic v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. PraterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
- United States v. HarperUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- United States v. InabinetteCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2008
- United States v. BeatyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2011
- United States v. BookerNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2013
- United States v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2008
- United States v. Specialist CEY BRISTOL J. WILLIAMSArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2016
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.