Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Frigidaire Division v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1988No. 86-1777PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLocher, J.

The sole issue presented by this appeal is whether the commission abused its discretion in affirming the order of the district hearing officer. Our review is limited to a determination of whether there is some evidence to support the decision of the commission. See, e.g., State, ex rel. Stephenson, v. Indus. Comm. (1987), 31 Ohio St. 3d 167, 170, 31 OBR 369, 372, 509 N.E. 2d 946, 949; State, ex rel. Burley, v. Coil Packing, Inc. (1987), 31 Ohio St. 3d 18, 20, 31 OBR 70, 72, 508 N.E. 2d 936, 938.

It is well-settled that the determination of disputed facts and the weighing of evidence are…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Burley v. Coil Packing, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State ex rel. Stephenson v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State ex rel. Mitchell v. Robbins & Myers, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State ex rel. Nye v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State ex rel. Hudson v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Noll v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State ex rel. DeMint v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State ex rel. LTV Steel Co. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State ex rel. Buttolph v. General Motors Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State ex rel. General American Transportation Corp. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1990

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API