Legal Opinion

Roberts v. State

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 22, 1999No. 24254PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TROUT, Chief Justice.

Douglas Doyle Roberts (Roberts) appeals the district judge’s denial of Roberts’ petition for post conviction relief. In his post conviction proceedings, Roberts submitted the affidavits of four jurors from his trial. Roberts claims the district judge erred when striking those affidavits. Roberts also complains that the district judge erred in not finding ineffective assistance of counsel.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

The Trial. Roberts is no stranger to the Idaho appellate courts. The following factual account is taken from this Court’s decision in State v. Roberts,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. BearshieldIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Russell v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. State v. TuckerIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
  5. State v. PorterIdaho Supreme Court · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dunlap v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
  2. City of Boise v. FrazierIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
  3. McKeeth v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Troy Dwayne Payne v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. City of Boise v. FrazierIdaho Supreme Court · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API