Legal Opinion

McKeeth v. State

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 2004No. 30864PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURDICK, Justice.

William McKeeth appeals from the district court’s denial of his petition for post-conviction relief. McKeeth contends his guilty pleas to multiple counts of sexual exploitation by a medical care provider were involuntary because of ineffective assistance of counsel. We agree and therefore reverse.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

William McKeeth, a licensed professional counselor, pleaded guilty to six counts of sexual exploitation by a medical care provider. The charges arose from allegations that McKeeth had sexual contact with six patients. McKeeth’s counsel drafted a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Aragon v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1988
  5. McKinney v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Ridgley v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. Azad Haji AbdullahIdaho Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Booth v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Schoger v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Jeffrey Dane Murray v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2014

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API