McKeeth v. State
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BURDICK, Justice.
William McKeeth appeals from the district court’s denial of his petition for post-conviction relief. McKeeth contends his guilty pleas to multiple counts of sexual exploitation by a medical care provider were involuntary because of ineffective assistance of counsel. We agree and therefore reverse.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
William McKeeth, a licensed professional counselor, pleaded guilty to six counts of sexual exploitation by a medical care provider. The charges arose from allegations that McKeeth had sexual contact with six patients. McKeeth’s counsel drafted a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Aragon v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1988
- McKinney v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Ridgley v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. Azad Haji AbdullahIdaho Supreme Court · 2015
- Booth v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
- Schoger v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
- Jeffrey Dane Murray v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2014
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.