Legal Opinion

Great American Indemnity Co. v. Durham

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 17, 1936No. 25563PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

A misjoinder of parties is a defect which should be taken advantage of by special demurrer filed at the first term. Burkhalter v. Peoples Bank, 175 Ga. 744 (3) (165 S. E. 749); Ga. R. Co. v. Tice, 124 Ga. 459, 462 (52 S. E. 916, 4 Ann. Cas. 200); Willingham v. Glover, 28 Ga. App. 394 (111 S. E. 206), and cit. There being no demurrer to the instant petition, which was brought to recover automobile damages jointly against an individual motor carrier and the insurer, on an insurance policy given under the provisions of section 7 of the motor common-carrier act of 1931 (Ga. L. 1931, pp. 199, 203;…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. TiceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. Willingham, Wright & Covington v. GloverCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
  3. LaHatte v. WaltonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  4. Burkhalter v. Peoples BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932
  5. Great American Indemnity Co. v. VickersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cotton States Mutual Insurance v. KeefeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
  2. Cotton States Mutual Insurance v. KeefeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
  3. Tarrant v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
  4. Spicer v. American Home Assurance Co.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1967
  5. Cotton States Mutual Insurance v. KeefeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API