Legal Opinion

Burkhalter v. Peoples Bank

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 26, 1932No. 8700PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

1. “As a general rule, a bank may assume that a trustee will apply money deposited by him to its proper purposes under the trust, and is not accountable for any misappropriation of trust funds in which it does not participate; but a bank can not, without incurring liability to the true owner, knowingly appropriate to the satisfaction of a debt due to it by another trust funds deposited with it by him after the creation of such debt.” American Trust &c. Co. v. Boone, 102 Ga. 202 (29 S. E. 182, 40 L. R. A. 250, 66 Am. St. R. 167); Miller v. Gibbs, 161 Ga. 698 (5) (132 S. E. 626).

2. “All persons…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. American Trust & Banking Co. v. BooneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  2. Willingham, Wright & Covington v. GloverCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
  3. Ray v. PitmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  4. Hunt v. DoyalSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  5. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Grant v. HartSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  2. Georgia Railroad Bank & Trust Co. v. Liberty National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  3. Harrison v. HolsenbeckSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
  4. National Factor & Investment Corp. v. State BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1968
  5. Burkhalter v. Glennville BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API