Legal Opinion

Bladow v. Bladow

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 25, 2005No. 20040315PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Wesley Charles Bladow appealed, and Kristine Gail Bladow, formerly known as Kristine Gail Berg, cross-appealed from an amended divorce judgment modifying the parties’ joint custody agreement, awarding Berg attorney fees, and determining the parties’ child support obligations. We affirm the trial court’s custody decision and award of attorney fees, reverse the court’s determination of Bla-dow’s child support obligation, and remand for further proceedings.

I

[¶ 2] Bladow and Berg were divorced in January 2003, under a stipulated agreement and judgment that awarded them…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Buchholz v. BuchholzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Loll v. LollNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Quarne v. QuarneNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Schumacher v. SchumacherNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Hilgers v. HilgersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Berge v. BergeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Ehli v. JoyceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Dietz v. DietzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Clark v. ClarkNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Sweeney v. KirbyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API