Sweeney v. Kirby
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CROTHERS, Justice.
[¶ 1] Dawn Kirby appeals a district court order denying her motion to modify primary residential responsibility without an evidentiary hearing. We reverse and remand, concluding Kirby made a prima facie case for modification, warranting an evidentiary hearing.
I
[¶ 2] Kirby and Brian Sweeney are the parents of D.L.K., who was born in 2004. Kirby and Sweeney were not married and never lived together. Paternity was established in 2006, and a child support obligation was set. Prior to seeking primary residential responsibility, Sweeney saw D.L.K. three times in a six-year period.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Green v. GreenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- Schumacker v. SchumackerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Bladow v. BladowNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
3Cited by18 opinions
- Kartes v. KartesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Jensen v. JensenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Wald v. HolmesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Anderson v. JenkinsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Charvat v. CharvatNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.