Legal Opinion

Sweeney v. Kirby

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 2013No. 20120339PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROTHERS, Justice.

[¶ 1] Dawn Kirby appeals a district court order denying her motion to modify primary residential responsibility without an evidentiary hearing. We reverse and remand, concluding Kirby made a prima facie case for modification, warranting an evidentiary hearing.

I

[¶ 2] Kirby and Brian Sweeney are the parents of D.L.K., who was born in 2004. Kirby and Sweeney were not married and never lived together. Paternity was established in 2006, and a child support obligation was set. Prior to seeking primary residential responsibility, Sweeney saw D.L.K. three times in a six-year period.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Green v. GreenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Schumacker v. SchumackerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Bladow v. BladowNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Kartes v. KartesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Jensen v. JensenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Wald v. HolmesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Anderson v. JenkinsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Charvat v. CharvatNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API