Legal Opinion

Costello v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided December 1, 2011No. Civil Action No. 2011-0389PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

REGGIE B. WALTON, District Judge.

The plaintiffs, Danny Costello and Gai Nguyen, bring this civil lawsuit against the District of Columbia (the “District”), seeking redress for an alleged unlawful search of their apartment in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006), the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution, and 18 U.S.C. § 3109 (2006). See Third Amended Complaint for Violation of Civil and Constitutional Rights (“Am. Compl.”) ¶¶ 4-23. Currently before the Court is the defendant’s motion to dismiss the third amended complaint. Upon careful consideration of the third…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Board of the County Commissioners of Bryan County v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Thorp v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
  2. Wells v. HenseDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
  3. Bell Ex Rel. Estate of Sweptson v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
  4. Patrick v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
  5. Runnymede-Piper v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API